<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes You Should Lose Your Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.franklaneltd.com/linkage/sometimes-you-should-lose-your-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.franklaneltd.com/linkage/sometimes-you-should-lose-your-head/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sometimes-you-should-lose-your-head</link>
	<description>Helping Clients Build Killer Brand™ Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.franklaneltd.com/linkage/sometimes-you-should-lose-your-head/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.franklaneltd.com/?p=86#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Randy, welcome and thanks for your comment.  Very good input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy, welcome and thanks for your comment.  Very good input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.franklaneltd.com/linkage/sometimes-you-should-lose-your-head/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.franklaneltd.com/?p=86#comment-90</guid>
		<description>What bothered me more than the chosen devise is the fact that this significant differentiation gets so lost! Going for a &quot;clever&quot; or humorous approach does not seem to do justice to what I perceive as a significant breakthrough, as you suggest.

Maybe the better analogy would have been the fact that rather than ignoring the biggest drawback of an electric (blades get dull), now electric users can change blades like manual users.

Retaining the convenience of an electric.
Gaining the advantage of a hand razor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bothered me more than the chosen devise is the fact that this significant differentiation gets so lost! Going for a &#8220;clever&#8221; or humorous approach does not seem to do justice to what I perceive as a significant breakthrough, as you suggest.</p>
<p>Maybe the better analogy would have been the fact that rather than ignoring the biggest drawback of an electric (blades get dull), now electric users can change blades like manual users.</p>
<p>Retaining the convenience of an electric.<br />
Gaining the advantage of a hand razor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

